Read 1 Samuel 15.24-35. In verse 27:Grasping the hem of a person's garment was a way of submitting or pleading. In verse 28: Samuel uses the torn hem as an object lesson. . The Lord has torn the kingdom from Saul and given it to his neighbor, an allusion to David. In verse 29: The point of this verse is that the Lord will not change his mind, so Saul's further pleading is futile. The Glory of Israel is an epithet for the Lord not used elsewhere in the Hebrew Bible. The general message of the verse seems to contradict the larger context in which the Lord has changed his mind about allowing Saul to be king. Some scholars address contradiction by positing v, 29 as a later addition. In verse 33: Agag's dismemberment before the Lord at the hands of Samuel was a ritual execution as punishment either for war crimes or for violation of an unknown treaty. In verse 35: The statement that Samuel did not see Saul again until the day of his death anticipates the story in 1 Sam 28 but stands intension with 1 Sam 19.18-24. Comments or Questions..
Thursday, February 29, 2024
Wednesday, February 28, 2024
Reading for March 7th
Read 1 Samuel 15.10-23. In verse 15: Saul defends himself by blaming his troops (the people) for sparing the best of the sheep and cattle, though he is implicated in v. 9. He also says that the animals were spared for sacrifice, and this is the ground for Samuel's subsequent rebuke. In verse 22: The fat of rams was part of the animal burned in sacrifice to the Lord. In verse 23: The kind of divination prohibited here is related to foreign idolatry and does not include divination through a legitimate priest of the Lord. Rebellion and stubbornness are like the divination and idolatry because they involve turning away from the Lord. Comments or Questions..
Tuesday, February 27, 2024
Reading for March 6th
Read 15.1-9. In 15.1-35: Another rejection of Saul. In verse 2: An allusion to the story in Ex 17.8-16, which is also recalled in Deut 25.17-19. In verse 3: The order to utterly destroy the Amalekites reflect the practice of the "ban" or "devotion to destruction" (Heb., "herem"), used by Israel and other peoples in the ancient Middle East. When it was implemented as a kind of sacrifice to the deity. In verse 4: Saul's army is unbelievably large. Either the figure have been exaggerated or the Hebrew word translated "thousand" actually refers to a military unit much smaller than a thousand men. In verse 6: The precise event in which the Kenites showed kindness is unknown. Comments or Questions..
Monday, February 26, 2024
Reading for March 5th
Read 1 Samuel 14.47-52. In verses 47-48: These verses indicate Saul's military success as king. Moab, the Ammonites, and Edom were three countries on the other side of the Jordan from Israel. Zobah was an important Aramean (Syrian) city-state. The Amalekites were a nomadic tribe south of Judah. The reference to Saul's defeat of them is contradicted by the story in ch.15. In verses 49: Ishvi may be the same as Ishbaal, Saul's successor, who is otherwise not named in this list. In verse 52: The reference to Saul's draft of any strong or valiant is an appropriate introduction to the story of David beginning in 16.14. Comments or Questions..
Sunday, February 25, 2024
Reading for March 4th
Read 1 Samuel 14.36-46. Finally, Saul's oath nearly cost the life of Jonathan. The inquiry through the priest (v. 37) involves yes/no questions, with the additional possibility that no answer will be forthcoming. Verses 40-42 illustrate at least on method of divination or lot casting. Neither the mechanism nor the meaning of the Urim and Thummim are known, but they function to answer yes/no questions. or to choose between two alternatives. In verse 45: It is not clear exactly how the people ransomed Jonathan. Perhaps this situation foreshadows Jonathan's death before he can succeed Saul. Comments or Questions..
Saturday, February 24, 2024
Reading for March 3rd
Read 1 Sam14.23b-35. In verses 24-30: Saul's foolish oath caused his troops to be faint and prevented them from gaining a complete victory. In verses 31-35: A further result of Saul's oath was that it led his hungry soldiers to commit a ritual offense by slaughtering animals on the ground so that the blood did not drain out. hence, they ate meat cooked with the blood. Saul then commanded them to roll a large stone to the site so that animals could be slaughtered upon the stone (thereby allowing the blood to be drained before the meat was cooked and eaten. Comments or Questions..
Friday, February 23, 2024
Reading for March 2nd
Read 1 Samuel 13.23-14.23a. In 13.23: The battle begins with the Philistines' movement to the pass on their side of the valley. In 14.1: The young man who carried who carried his armor: The armor-bearer was a formidable soldier as the involvement of this man in battle shows. In verse 3: This ephod was an object that was carried by priests and used to divine the will of God. It was carried in priestly garments, which may explain why the same word was used for both (1 Sam 2.18). The people is often used to mean the army. In verses 6: These uncircumcised is a derogatory term for the Philistines, In verse 13: Jonathan wounded the Philistines, and his armor-bearer finished them off. In verse 19: Withdraw your hand: Saul had called Ahijah, the priest with the intention of consulting the Lord through him (the Greek text reads "ephods" instead of "ark"). before receiving an answer to his inquiry, Saul decided to attack. In verse 21: The Hebrews here are distinguished from the Israelites. They are first allied with the Philistines and then turn against them. They may have been mercenaries of some kind. Comments or Questions..
Thursday, February 22, 2024
Reading for March 1st
Read 1 Samuel 13.15b-22. These verses set the stage for the battle account in the next chapter. Geba and Michmash (v.16) were across from each other on opposite sides of a valley. The Philistine raiders (vv. 17-18) customarily went north, west, and east from Michmash to attack Israelite settlements and keep them subdued. The Philistines also controlled the Israelites by maintaining a monopoly on iron working (vv. 19-22). Comments or Questions..
Wednesday, February 21, 2024
Reading for February 29th
Read 1 Samuel 13.1-15a. in 13.1-14.52: Saul's wars with the Philistines. In 13.1 Saul's age at his accession is unknown. The Hebrew text actually says he was one year old, which is, of course, impossible it also says, that he reigned two years, but the events recounted for huis reign indicate a much longer period. In verses 3-4: Jonathan, Saul's son is mentioned here for the first time. Since he is a grown man, this story is substantially later that 9.1-10..16, where Saul appears as a young man. Both Jonathan and Saul are credited with defeating the Philistine garrison. This may indicate the composite nature of the account, or Saul, as king, may have received the credit for his son's victory. Geba and Gibeah are very similar in Hebrew and appear to be confused here. In verses 7b-15a: This story of Saul's rejection alludes to Samuel's order in 10.8, Both passages refer to an interval of seven days between them, but the intervening events in chs. 10-12 would require a much longer time. The nature of Saul's sin is not altogether clear. Perhaps he is condemned for trying to usurp Samuel's role of religious leadership. The man after (Yahweh's) own heart is an allusion to David. It does not imply any special quality of David but is simply a way of saying that he is chosen by the Lord. Comments or Questions..
Tuesday, February 20, 2024
Reading for February 28th
Read 1 Samuel 12.19-25. Samuel again described as an intercessor on behalf of the peoples. The language of these verses, especially vv. 24-25, underlines the main themes of the Deuteronomistic History. For his great name's sake in v. 22 means that Yahweh's own reputation might be damaged if he were not patient with his people but destroyed them too readily. Comments or Questions..
Monday, February 19, 2024
Reading for February 27th
Read 1 Samuel 12.1-18. In 1.1-25: Samuel's farewell. In verse 3: words are reminiscent of Moses' in Num 16.15: and contrast with the "ways of the king": that he listed in Sam 8.6-1: This long retrospective on Israel's history expresses the opinions and concerns of the deuteronomistic editor. In verses 13-15: Even though the people's request for a king evinced a lack of faith, they and their king can still prosper as long as they serve the Lord. In verses 16-18: The wheat harvest was in early summer. The lack of rain was a threat to the crops. Thus, this miracle shows the Lord's response to Samuel and hints at his displeasure with the people. Comments or Questions..
Sunday, February 18, 2024
Reading for February 26th
Read 1 Samuel 27b-11.15. In 10.27b-11.15: Saul defeats the Ammonites. In 10.27b: This paragraph was lost from the Hebrew text but can now be restored from a Dead Sea Scroll fragment of Samuel. The missing material explains the reason for the conflict in ch 11. The Gadites are the Reubenites were Israelites living east of the Jordan River in territory which the Ammonite king, Nahash, considered his, but which Israel also claimed. The city of Jabesh in Gilead was farther north and outside of the disputed area, but Nahash threatened it because some of the Israelites from Gad and Rueben had fled there. In 11.3: The messages are not sent directly to Saul but through all the territory of Israel. In verses 4-5: Even in Gibeah the messengers do not seek out Saul, but he learns of their mission because of the weeping of the people as he returns from the field. Thus, the story does not seem to assume that Saul is king. In verse 6: The spirit of the God spurs Saul to military action as it had some of the delivers in the book of Judges. In verse 7: Saul's action symbolizes a threat against the animals and perhaps the people themselves who do not join in the war. References to dismemberment occur in ancient treaties, so that Saul's actions assumes covenant relationship among the tribes. In verse 8: The division between Israel and Judah is reflected here through it did not occur until after Solomon's reign. In verse 10: We will give ourselves up to you means literally, "we will come out to you." What sounds to Nahash like a surrender cleverly masks a threat. The people of Jabesh will come out to fight. In verse 11: The next day actually began at sunset according to Israelite reckoning and the morning watch was in the early hours before sunrise. This was a surprise attack before dawn. In verses 12:14: These verses are editorial and bind 10.17-27a with 10.27b-11.15. It was the "worthless fellows" in 10.27 a who asked, Shall Saul reign over us? The editor adds Samuel to the story at this point even though he plays no role in the battle account. The editor also speaks of renew(ing) the kingship. In verse 15: The original story did not assume that Saul was already king but explained that the people made Saul king as a result of his victory on this occasions. Comments or Questions..
Saturday, February 17, 2024
Reading for February 25th
Read 1 Samuel 10.17-27a. In 10.17-27a: Saul is chosen by lot. In verses 18-19: These verses offer another example of deuteronomistic language. In verses 20-21: Israelite society was structured according to a hierarchy: tribe, clan, family ("house of the father"), and individual. Elsewhere in the Bible (Josh 7.14; 1 Sam 14.41) the lot is used to find a person guilty of breaking the law or vow. Some scholars believe that two stories are combined at this point, one in which Saul was present and chosen by lot and another in which he was chosen by oracle or because of his height. In verse 22: Inquired is another pun on Saul's name. In verse 25: The rights and duties of the kingship probably setout the responsibilities of king and people to each other. The expression here is nearly identical to "the way of the king" in 8.9, 11, although the two passages seem to refer to two different lists or documents. In verses 26-27a: Saul's return to Gibeah and the doubts of the worthless fellows prepare the way for the subsequent story in which Saul will prove his ability to save Israel. Comments or Questions..
Friday, February 16, 2024
Reading for February 24th
Read 1 Samuel 9.27--10.16. In verse 1: The Lord's heritage is the land of Israel. The original idea behind this expression is that every nation is the inheritance of the god it worships. In verses 3-4: The three men going up to God at Bethel are carrying items for sacrifice. They give two loaves of bread to Saul, one for him and one for his servant. A better reading, found in the Greek translation known as the Septuagint, is "two offerings of bread." Thus Saul again receives the portion of a priest. In verses 5-7: Music was often used to induce an ecstasy in which prophets uttered their oracles (2 Kings 3.15-16). The judges were also moved to action by the spirit of the Lord. Saul's instruction to do whatever you see fit to do is a military commission. In verse 8: This verse connects this story to 13.7b-15. In verses 10-13: These verses describe the fulfillment of the third sign The description is also an etiology for the proverb, Is Saul also among the prophets? (v. 11). A different explanation occurs in 19.19-24. Whatever its origin, the proverb seems to have a positive meaning in this context. The Lord's spirit empowers Saul both to prophesy and to rule. The father of a group of prophets (v. 12) is their leader. In verses 14-16: it is surprising that Saul's uncle rather than his father questions him, since the uncle has not been mentioned before in the story. Thee verses are editorial and set the stage for the following story (10.17-27a). Since Saul's anointing was private, there is a a need for a public proclamation that he is king. Comments or Questions..
Thursday, February 15, 2024
Reading for February 23rd
Read 1 Samuel 9.22-26. In verses 22-24: Saul is treated as a highly honored guest. He is given the thigh, which is usually reserved for the deity or the priests. In verse 25: Saul sleeps on the roof, which was flat and where there was a cool breeze, indicating that the story is set in summer. Comments or Questions..
Wednesday, February 14, 2024
Reading for February 22nd
Read 1 Samuel 9.15-21. In verse 16: Anointing involved smearing a person's head with scented olive oil as a way of designating the person for a particular office. Ruler in Hebrew is "nagid," which means "king designate" in the is verse. In verse 18: The gate of a city was a well-fortified entrance to a walled city. It was the site of commerce and the place when trials were held. In verses 19-20: In the original tale, the seer consulted God overnight in order to address Saul's need. But the old tale has been transformed editorially so that Samuel has been told to expect Saul (vv. 15-17) and now goes ahead and tells him all that is on his mind by assuring him that the donkeys' have been found (v. 20). The next morning is reserved for Saul's anointing. In verse 21: Saul's objection is typical of people who receive a divine call (Jer 1.6). It also shows Saul's humility and God's preference for the small and weak. Comments or Questions..
Tuesday, February 13, 2024
Reading for February 21st
Read 1 Samuel 9.11-14. In verse 11: Cities were built on hills for protection. Drawing water was typically done by women, usually in the morning or evening when it was cooler. This suggests that it was around sundown. In verse 12: The shrine or "high place," was a hill or raise platform where worship, especially sacrifices, took place. Since deuteronomistic literature generally condemns the high places, this reference is probably part of the original tale. In verses 13: Some sacrifices provided occasions for feasting after the portion of the animal designated for God was burned. Comments or Questions..
Monday, February 12, 2024
Reading for February 20th
Read 1 Samuel 9.1-10. In 9.1-10.16: Saul's anointing. In 9.2: Saul's height and handsomeness are qualities typically attributed to a king. In verse 3: Donkeys' were ridden by kings (Zech 9.9;Mt 21.1-9), so that the story already hints ay Saul's kingship. One of the boys refers to a servant who may or may not have been young. Inverse 6: Man of God is a title for a prophet. This prophet turns out to be Samuel (v. 14). But the identification is secondary, since Saul and his servant do not initially seem to know who Samuel is. In the original tale, Saul's encounter was with an anonymous seer. The town would have been understood as Ramah, Samuel's house. In verse 7: The present was necessary as a sort of payment to the man of God for diving the whereabouts of the donkeys. In verse 8: A shekel was not a coin but a measure of weight of less than half an ounce. In verse 9: This is an obvious editorial comment identifying a seer as a prophet. Comments or Questions..
Reading for February 19th
CHOOSING A KING: Chs. 8-12: Chapters 9-11 contain three accounts of Saul's being chosen king that have been bound together editorially and surrounded by Samuel's convocations of the people in chs 8 and 12.
Read 1 Samuel 8.1-22. 8.1-22: Israel demands a king. In verses 1-2: Beer-sheba was the southernmost city in Judah and far outside of Samuel's jurisdiction in 7.15-17. It became an administrative center during the period of the monarchy of Judah. These facts suggest 8.1-3 may have been written against the practice of hereditary leadership. Like Eli's sons, Samuel's sons are evil. In verses 4-9:Both Samuel and the Lord are displeased by the people's request for a king This does not necessarily mean that monarchy itself is bad but only that the people's request demonstrates a lack of faith in the Lord. In verse 8: The review of Israel's history as one of forsaking the Lord is indicative of the deuteronomistic narrator's view. In verse 10: asking is a play on the name "Saul." In verses 11-17: These verses preview the social consequences of monarchy by detailing the ways of the king. The Hebrew word translated ways means "custom" or "judgment." Ironically the king to who the people look for justice will follow the typical ancient Near Eastern practices of taxation and conscription of workers for his service. The items in this list appear to be based on Solomon's reign. In verse 18: The language of this verse is characteristic of the deuteronomistic narrator and resembles that of the framework of the book of Judges. In verse 20: Govern, or "judge". In verse 22: The Lord permits the people to have a king even though he does not approve of their demand. Comments or Questions..
Reading for February 18th
Read 1 Samuel 7.2--17. In 7.2-17: Samuel judges Israel. Samuel is described as a transitional figure between the era of the judges and the monarchy. He embodies the roles of priest, prophet, and now judge. In verse 2: Twenty years is a way of designating half a generation. the phrase fits Samuel into the structure of the book of Judges in which a period of foreign oppression precedes Israel's repentance. In verses 3-4: The call for returning to the Lord with all your heart from the sin of idolatry marks these verses as an addition by the deuteronomistic editor. Baal and Astarte were leading male and female fertility gods of Canaan. In verse 5: Mizpah became the administrative and religious capital after Jerusalem's destruction in 586 BCE. The setting of this story in Mizpah may indicate a late date of composition. In verse 6: The libations and fasting described here are part of a community purification ritual, perhaps for war. In verses 8-9: Samuel is depicted as an intercessory for the people in the tradition of Moses and Jeremiah. In verse 10: The first part of this verse is parenthetical; Yahweh's answer is the thunder. In verse 12: An etiology for the name Ebenezer, whose original meaning was religious and military; "stone of the helper/warrior." In verses 13-14: The typical deuteronomistic formula for the judges are here applied to Samuel (compare Judg 3.30; 8.28; 11.33). In verses 15-17: The book of Judges describes two type of judges; military leaders and legal figures. This chapter ascribes both roles to Samuel. The towns of Bethel, Gilgal, Mizpah, and Ramah were all within the territories of the tribes of Ephraim and Benjamin. Comments or Questions..
Reading for February 17th
Read 1 Samuel 6.1-7.1. In 6.1-7.1 The return of the ark. Suspecting that the ark is the source of their problems, the Philistines decide to send it back to Israel. They include with it a guilt offering (v. 3), which should probably be understood as as compensation for having taken the ark and in hopes of a pleasing the Lord and avoiding further punishment from him. There is one gold tumor and one gold mouse for each of the five Philistine cities (vv. 4, 17-18). In verse 7: The cart is new and therefor ritually pure. The two cows have never been yoked and are therefore fit to be sacrificed (compare Num 19.2; Deut 21.3). They are also milch cows, meaning that they have young calves. this is part of the test described in v. 9. In verses 9: Unaccustomed to pulling a cart, these two cows would be expected to wander aimlessly in search of their calves. If, contrary to this expectation, the cows headed straight for Israelite territory, the Philistines would know that their sufferings had indeed been sent by the Lord. In verse 12: The cows take the most direct route into Israelite territory. In verse 15: This verse us likely a later addition by a scribe concerned to have the Levites, the priestly tribe, handle the ark. In verse 20: Who is able to stand before the Lord is apparently a technical expression for priestly service. the people are asking whether there is a priest who can handle the ark. Comments or Questions
Thursday, February 8, 2024
Reading for February 16th
Read 1 Samuel 5.1-12. In 5.1-12: The Lord's triumph. In the ancient Near East, wars between nations were interpreted as contests between their respective gods. This story explains that even though the Philistines defeated Israel, the Lord was superior to Dagon, a Philistine god. In verse 1: Ashdod was one of five principal Philistine cities. The other four were Ashkelon, Ekron, Gath, and Gaza. In verse 2: Beside Sagon means beside the idol or statue of Dagon in is temple or house. Dagon was a Canaanite fertility god adopted by the Philistines. In verse 3: After the first night the Philistines find the idol Dagon bowing prostrate before the ark. In verses 4-5: This is an etiology for the practice of jumping over thresholds in order to avoid offending the spirits of a particular building or space (compare Zeph 1.9). In verses 6-12: The tumors and mice (in the next chapter) have led to the identification of this outbreak as bubonic plague, which was common in costal areas. According to this story, however, the plague is the Lord's doing. In verse*: The lords of the Philistines are the rulers of the five Philistine cities. The word for lord here ("seren") is Philistine and cognate with the Greek word "tyrannos" or tyrant. Comments or Questions..
Wednesday, February 7, 2024
Reading for February 15th
Read 1 Samuel 4.1b-22. In 4.1b-22: The capture of the ark. Many scholars believe that 4.1-7.1 and possibly 2 Sam 6 are based on an old "ark narrative" which described the capture and return of the ark. In verse 1b: The Philistines came from the northwestern Mediterranean area (especially the island of Crete and entered Palestine (which is derived from 'Philistine") in approximately 1200 BCE, about the same time the Israelites were emerging in the central highlands. In this period they were Israel's traditional enemy. In verse 4: Cherubim were mythical griffin-like creatures with body parts from different creatures, often including wings and human heads. They were commonly depicted in palaces and temples. The ark is described as the throne of "the Lord of hosts who sits enthroned on the cherubim," and the Israelites believe that the Lord is therefor present with them in battle. In verse 6: Hebrews is a term commonly used in the Bible but foreigners speaking of the Israelites. It may designate socioeconomic group rather that an ethic or family unit. In verses 7-8: God's: The Philistines assume that the Israelites, like themselves, are polytheists. In verse 18: Forty years in the Bible is a round number for a single generation. In verses 21-22: Ichabod probably means "Where is the glory?" Phinehas' wife gives her son this name in lamentation for the capture of the ark, which represents the Lord's presence or glory. Comments or Questions..
Tuesday, February 6, 2024
Reading for February 14th
Read 1 Samuel 3.1--4.1a. In 3.1-.4.1a: Samuel's call. In verse 1: Word of the Lord ... visions are mean of prophetic revelation. Inverse 3: The lamp in the temple was to burn at night (Ex 27.21). Since the lamp of God had not yet gone out, it must have been just before dawn. Samuel's bed was in the temple near the inner sanctuary where the ark of God was kept. In verse 7: Samuel did not know the Lord: Samuel's role as a prophet had not yet been established since the word of the Lord had not yet been revealed to him. That he would "know" the Lord provides a further contrast to Eli's sons, who did not regard or "know" the Lord (2.12). In verse 14: Eli's sons are guilty of profaning the sacrifices that might otherwise have atoned for their sins. In verse 17: May God do so to you and more also is a typical oath formula. Eli adjures Samuel, forcing him to reveal his conversation with the Lord. In verses 19-21: All of Samuel's prophecies come true (none fall to the ground), and this is known from Fan to Beer-sheba, the traditional northern and southern kingdom boundaries of Israel. All Israel recognizes Samuel as a reliable prophet of the Lord. Comments or Questions..
Monday, February 5, 2024
Reading for February 13th
Read 1 Sam 2.27-36. In 2.27-36: The oracle against Eli. This was probably written by the deuteronomistic editor. In verse 27: Your ancestor may allude to Moses, to who Eli's family traced their ancestry, rather than the tribe of Levi. The names of Eli's sons, Hophni and Phinehas (1.3; 2.34), are actually Egyptian, which is consistent with the phrase in Egypt. In verse 28: To go up to my altar, to offer incense, to wear an ephod refer to three principal duties of priests. Going up to the altar refers to making animal sacrifices. In verses 31-33: The cutting off of Eli's household refers not to the death of Eli and his sons in 1 Sam4 but to Saul's annihilation of the priests of Nob in 1 Sam 22. Abiathar is the one spared. In verses 35-36: The faithful priest is Zadok, who came to prominence when Abiathar was banished by Solomon (1 Kings 1-2). The Zadokites were Aron's descendants, and this passage may reflect a rivalry between the descendants of Moses and Aron for the priesthood. Comments or Questions..
Sunday, February 4, 2024
Reading for February 12th
Read 1 Samuel 2.11-26, In 2.11-26: The wicked sons of Eli. Samuel's faithful service contrasts with the evil deeds of Eli's sons and hints that he will replace Eli. In verses 12-17: Priests made their living by receiving a portion of the sacrifices. The custom in Shiloh (vv. 13-14), which is different from that prescribed elsewhere (Lev 7.28-36; Deut 18.3), was for the priest to get whatever the fork brought up while the meat was boiling. By demanding the fat portion, which properly belonged to God, and taking a first, before the sacrifice was made, Eli's sons were sinning directly against the Lord (v. 25) by treating him with contempt (vv. 12-17). Moreover , they threatened violence against worshippers who tried to do the right (v. 16). In verse 18: The linen ephod was a kind of apron worn by priests. In verse 22: The tent of meeting is another name for the tabernacle, a moveable shrine. Apparently the temple of the Lord at Shiloh (1.3) was actually a tent shrine. In verse 25: It was the will of the Lord to kill them: This explanation of the obstinacy of Eli's sons is like God's hardening of Pharaoh's heart in Ex 4-12. Comments or Questions..
Saturday, February 3, 2024
Reading for February 11th
Read 1 Samuel 2.1-10. In 2.1-10: The song of Hannah. This is a psalm of thanksgiving for a national victory that has been placed in Hannah's mouth. In verse 1: Strength, literally, "horn," seems to make use of the image of a proud animal. In verse 5: The barren has borne seven: This line probably led to the psalm's insertion. Hannah had only six children (2.21). In verse 6: Sheol was the place of the dead, the under world. In verse 10: The reference to his king shows that the psalm was written later than Hannah since there was not king of Israel yet in her time. Anointed, (Heb., "mashiah") was a title for the king and the source of the term "messiah.' Comments or Questions..
Friday, February 2, 2024
Reading for February 10th
Read 1 Samuel 1.19-28. In 1.19-28: Samuel's birth. The gift of a son to Hannah shows God's favor toward the disadvantaged and indicates that Samuel is chosen for a special purpose.. In verse 19: Elkanah's name ostensibly means "God has heard," so the reader expects Hannah to say that she named her son Samuel because "God heard" her prayer. Her statement that asked him of the Lord is a pun on the name of Saul instead. In verse 28: Given is another pun on Saul's name. This is exactly the same as as Saul's name in Hebrew (("sha'ul"). It might even be translated, "He is Saul to the Lord." These puns may indicate that this story was originally about Saul's birth rather than Samuel's or they may simply be the author's way of alluding to Saul as Israel first king. Comments or Questions..
Thursday, February 1, 2024
Reading for February 9th
Read 1 Samuel 1.1-18. In 1.1-18: Hannah's request. In verse 3: Elkanah's annual pilgrimage to the temple of Yahweh or house of the Lord (v. 7) in Shiloh shows him to be a righteous man. Lord of host or "armies" (Heb., "sebaoth") describes the Lord's leadership in wars both divine and on behalf of Israel. In verses 5-8: The value of a woman's ability to bear children in ancient Israel lies behind Hannah's depression. Her barrenness is comparable to that of Sarah, Rebekah, and Rachel in Genesis and of Samson's mother in Judg 13. In verse 11: Nazirites were devoted to the Lord for some special purpose and were prohibited from drinking alcohol or eating grapes, cutting their hair or beards, and approaching a dead body (Num 6,1-21). Intoxicants refers to a form of beer. In verse 13: Eli thought she was drunk either because his eyesight was poor (3.2) or because he had lost the capacity to discern the sacred from the secular, and therefore could not tell that Hannah was praying. Comments or Questions..